Visual network mapping
Not available in the beta. This page describes the method.
Tables list. A network shows. Institrace draws people, public bodies, companies and land titles as a graph so a structural relationship is visible in one view.
We only index public bodies. A supplier, developer, or care-home Ltd appears when a public file or a published identifier attaches it. We do not run a private-company directory.
MethodologyHow records attachWorked example: Birmingham CouncilFAQ
How it works
Every join in the index is an edge. A person is an officer of a public body. The same person holds a private directorship. A company is proprietor of an English title. A name in a committee minute points at that person. A PSC filing points at control of a tracked organisation. Visual network mapping takes those edges and renders them as a graph: nodes for people, bodies, companies and titles, lines for the public records that connect them.
The drawing is not a mood board. Each node opens the underlying record. Each edge cites the filing, the minute, or the title number that created it. Layout is built to be read, not decorated: the cluster around a body, the people who sit on more than one, the overseas company that owns land next to a name already in the officer graph. Zoom and filter follow the same constraints as the rest of the platform. What is not in a primary public record is not on the map.
What it does
Not available in the beta. This page describes the method. No other index we reviewed draws a network from committee papers, Companies House officers, HM Land Registry titles and British overseas-territory records together. Corporate-crime and due-diligence teams already think in graphs. The public-records world still thinks in PDFs. This page, and the map it describes, exist so that a multi-institution relationship does not have to be reconstructed from a spreadsheet.
Search engines treat this as its own problem. People look for visual network mapping of public officials, beneficial ownership graphs, and officer networks. They find investigation one-offs and closed commercial platforms. They do not find a live index of the UK public record drawn as a network. That gap is why this capability has its own address.