Hansard

Green-belt Planning Policy: Esher and Walton

06 Sep 2026 · Commons Chamber · 4 speeches · Official record

Commons debate API. Not a paper. A named member links to their Institrace record when we hold that seat.

  1. Matthew Pennycook

    I fully appreciate the hon. Lady’s concerns about inappropriate development around stations, such as Hersham and Claygate in her constituency. It is right that we seek to promote good development around well-connected stations, outside of settlements or on green-belt land, as those are some of the most sustainable locations for new homes in the country. However, the new NPPF makes clear that development proposals around such stations should not prejudice any proposals for long-term comprehensive... Full speech

  2. Matthew Pennycook

    The national planning policy framework contains strong protections for the green belt, making clear that inappropriate development in it should not be approved unless justified by very special circumstances. It is for local planning authorities themselves to set and review green-belt boundaries in accordance with national policy in the NPPF. Full speech

  3. Monica Harding

    The Government changes to planning rules are of considerable concern to my constituents and are leading to speculative applications everywhere. Theoretically, the changes could mean that the whole of my constituency, which is 50% green belt and has seven stations, will be concreted over. My constituents are certainly not opposed to growth or house building, but they do not want to be ignored. The long-standing right of councillors to call in applications has been removed, which runs counter to t... Full speech

  4. Monica Harding

    7. What assessment she has made of the potential impact of planning policy on green-belt land in Esher and Walton constituency. Full speech